The humidity factor in stomatal control and its effect on crop productivity
by El-Sharkawy M. A. (1988)
Mabrouk A. El-Sharkawy,
in Biological Control of Photosynthesis : Marcelle R., Clijsters H., Van Poucke M. (eds.) 187-198 – Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands –
—————-
Author’s submission
Abstract:
Stomata of various woody and herbaceous plant species respond directly to changes in leaf-to-air vapor pressure difference (VPD). Closure of stomata upon exposure to dry air occurs in many species without changes in bulk leaf wáter status, suggesting an underlying mechanism different from the well-known closure through reduction in bulk leaf wáter potential.
Recent studies in our laboratory on the response of cassava to wáter stress demonstrated that plants grown in pots or in the field, with and without soil wáter stress, were very sensitive to changes in atmospheric humidity. Both CO2 uptake rate and H2O loss decreased greatly as VPD increased.This decrease in gas exchange rate was associated with a reduction in leaf conductance in the absence of changes in leaf wáter potential.
The strong stomatal response to changes in VPD may be of particular importance to perennial crops, such as cassava , that may have to endure a long period of drought. Under these conditions, and in the absence of stomatal response to humidity, both photosynthesis and transpiration will continue at relatively high rates until available soil wáter is depleted and leaf wáter potential drops to the level required to induce stomatal closure, at which time both photosynthesis and transpiration will approach zero.
In such case, most of the transpirational loss will occur during periods of high VPD and low photosynthesis/transpiration ratio, resulting in a low dry matter accumulation per unit wáter transpired.
On the other hand, with a direct stomatal response to changes in air humidity, available soil wáter will be depleted slowly, as most of the transpirational loss will occur during periods of the day when VPD is low and wáter use efficiency is highest. With a prolonged period of limited soil wáter, the greater wáter use efficiency will lead to a greater total accumulation of photosynthate over the stress period. Thus, the direct stomatal mechanism is beneficial for those crops that experience long period of drought. However, with non-limiting soil wáter conditions or only short periods of soil wáter stress, optimizing wáter use efficiency would not be as important as maximizing photosynthesis and consequently crop productivity.
Under these conditions non-sensitive stomata would be advantageous. An hypothesis is presented which relates stomatal sensitivity to stomatal density and is discussed in the light of selection methods for varieties with optimum productivity under different conditions of air humidity and soil wáter availability.
You must be logged in to post a comment.