A significant difference in stomata density and behavior between two orchids

Photo credit: Google

Pleurothallis aristata Hook. 1939 SUBGENUS Specklinia SECTION Muscariae Luer 1986

Stomata Density in Orchids and Cloud Forest Humidity.

by Predovich S. L. (2012)

Sierra Lynn Predovich

in Oregon Undergraduate Research Journal 3(1): 15-24 – ISSN 2160-617X. –– doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/uo/ourj.3.1.2386- 

http://journals.oregondigital.org/index.php/OURJ/article/view/2386

Photo credit Google – Maxillaria tenuifolia – https://richarddfieler.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/maxillaria-tenuifolia.jpg

Abstract

This experiment compares stomata density of the epiphytic Pleurothallis aristata and Maxillaria sp. orchids under experimental conditions of dry and humid environments.

Pleurothallis aristata is in the sub-tribe Pleurothallidinae and lacks pseudobulbs, while Maxillaria sp. has pseudobulbs.

The study seeks to determine what differences in stomata density exist between the two species, and if there is a difference in mean percent stomata open in humid and dry environments.

The study takes stomata impressions from the leaves of twenty individuals of each species using clear nail polish. The results show a significant difference in stomata density between the Pleurothallis aristata and the Maxillaria sp. (Rank Sum Test: t=55, n1=10, n2=10, p<0.05).

Additionally, both species have a higher percentage of open stomata in humid environments than in dry environments (Wilcoxon sign rank test). An explanation for these results is that Maxillaria sp. has a pseudobulb for water storage, has a larger leaf surface area, and therefore has higher stomata density.

The study showed both species closed their stomata in drier conditions in order to reduce water loss and desiccation.

The results of this experiment help demonstrate how different orchid species function in humid and dry environments, and their ability to succeed in the event of global climate change and shifting of biomes.