Chapter 9 – Water Transport Dynamics in Trees and Stands
Pallardy S.G., Čermák J., Ewers F. W., Kaufmann M. R., Parker W. C., Sperry J. S. (1995)
in Resource Physiology of Conifers -Acquisition, Allocation, and UtilizationPhysiological Ecology: 301-389 – https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-092591-2.50014-5 –
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978008092591250014
Publisher Summary
Most of the water lost by trees in transpiration is absorbed by roots. The pathway of liquid water movement—often termed the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum—is a complex network of individual pathways that may be divided into segments. This chapter discusses the water transport dynamics in trees and stands. Water transport dynamics in trees and stands of conifers have certain features that are characteristic of this group and are at least rare among angiosperms. Among these features is the xylem transport system that is dependent on tracheids for long-distance water transport. Tracheid-containing xylem is relatively inefficient, a property that can reduce submaximum allowable rates of gas exchange, but tracheids offer substantial capacity for water storage and high resistance to freezing-induced dysfunction. Thus, they are quite compatible with the typical evergreen habit and long transpiration season of conifers. At the stand level, canopy transpiration in conifers is primarily controlled by stomatal conductance. However, in dense canopies of angiosperms, particularly those of tropical forests with limited air mixing, stand transpiration is limited by radiation input rather than by stomatal control. Because of their evergreen habit, a greater proportion of evapotranspiration in conifer forests is associated with evaporation of water intercepted by the tree crowns. Transpiration rates from conifer foliage are often lower than those of deciduous angiosperms, probably because of the lower maximum capacity of tracheid-bearing xylem to transport water.
1 Dehydration Avoidance
Dehydration avoidance adaptations promote high plant water status during climatic drought through regulation of the balance between soil moisture uptake and transpirational water loss and through maintenance of a functional xylem transport system (see Section II,A,3). Numerous adaptations can be identified (Pallardy, 1981), but they can be categorized in functional categories as adaptations for (1) water acquisition [e.g., rooting patterns and growth, mycorrhizal associations, root–shoot allocation changes (Section I)], (2) efficient transport from roots to shoots [i.e., xylem characteristics (Sections II and III)], and (3) conservation of water by shoots.
A well-developed potential for avoidance of foliar water deficits through enhanced stomatal sensitivity to soil and/or atmospheric drought has been invoked to explain the drought tolerance adaptation of Juniperus occidentalis (Miller and Schultz, 1987), Pinus banksiana (Roberts and Dumbroff, 1986), and more xeric ecotypes of Pseudotsuga menziesii (Zavitkovski and Ferrell, 1968, 1970) and P. taeda (Bilan et al., 1977). Increased stomatal control of E also was associated with improved survival in conifer seedlings (Livingston and Black, 1988; Cui and Smith, 1991). An enhanced sensitivity of stomata to leaf ABA and a comparatively gradual decline in ABA (and increase in E) following stress alleviation were associated with dehydration avoidance capacity of P. banksiana (Roberts and Dumbroff, 1986). Prior exposure of some conifer species to water stress results in acclimation whereby stomatal response to subsequent stress is characterized by lower gs and enhanced stomatal sensitivity to declining shoot Ψ (Seiler and Johnson, 1985; Zwiazek and Blake, 1989).
A direct stomatal response to diurnal changes in atmospheric water saturation vapor pressure deficit (VPD) in the absence of significant changes in bulk leaf water status has been demonstrated for a number of conifers (Sandford and Jarvis, 1986; Grossnickle and Russell, 1991). This response provides a more efficient and sensitive mechanism for conservation of water than stomatal response to bulk leaf water status. Stomatal sensitivity to diurnal changes in VPD differs among conifer species, from very sensitive in Picea glauca (Goldstein et al., 1985) and Chamaecyparis nootkatensis (Grossnickle and Russell, 1991), to little if any response in P. taeda (Teskey et al., 1986). The response of stomatal aperture to VPD also varies with environmental factors such as light (Kaufmann, 1976; Beadle et al., 1985a; Goldstein et al., 1985), air and soil temperature (Beadle et al., 1985a; Miller and Schultz, 1987), and soil Ψ (Tan et al., 1977; Running, 1980c; Graham and Running, 1984). Plant factors such as shoot Ψ (Beadle et al., 1985b; Goldstein et al., 1985) or previous exposure to high VPD or low soil moisture may alter this stomatal response (Teskey et al., 1987; Mansfield and Atkinson, 1990). Generally, the lower the shoot or soil Ψ, the more sensitive the response or the lower the value of gs at a given VPD. The diurnal sensitivity of stomata to VPD may decrease over time with aging of the foliage (Kaufmann, 1976; Sandford and Jarvis, 1986; Guehl et al., 1991).
Efficient plant water use (high A/E ratios) could be an important adaptation of plants growing in water-limited environments (Cowan, 1977). From the model of Cowan and Farquhar (1977), stomatal “optimization” of gas exchange will occur when the relative sensitivity of A and E to changes in gs, δA/δE, remains constant despite environmental fluctuations that affect gs. This stomatal optimization hypothesis has been tested for a number of conifer species, with stomatal response conforming to this hypothesis in some species (Meinzer, 1982; Sandford and Jarvis, 1986; Guehl et al., 1991) but not in others (Sandford and Jarvis, 1986; Guehl and Aussenac, 1987; Fites and Teskey, 1988; Grieu et al., 1988). The variability in results suggests that optimized stomatal behavior may simply be one of many potentially adaptive traits.
Differences among and within conifer species in stomatal response to humidity have been invoked to define comparative drought tolerance and habitat segregation, but conflicting results have been reported. Comparisons among woody species suggest that species with high vigor and growth rate are generally less sensitive to humidity than are more slower growing, evergreen species (Marshall and Waring, 1984; Korner, 1985). Comparatively low sensitivity of stomata to VPD was offered as explanation for the confinement of some conifer species to more humid, mesophytic environments (Grossnickle and Blake, 1987a,b; Higgins et al., 1987). Populations of conifer species that originate in distinct humidity regimes also exhibit different gs-VPD relationships and stomatal adaptations to humidity. Seedlings of a dry land family of Abies alba were characterized by a stomatal response indicative of greater dehydration tolerance (Guehl and Aussenac, 1987). Conversely, dry site progeny of P. ponderosa had lower gs values at a given VPD compared with seedlings of more mesic, coastal origin, a stomatal adaptation for enhanced dehydration avoidance (Monson and Grant, 1989).
Stomatal closure at low Ts in the absence of changes in shoot water status also may constitute a drought avoidance mechanism. The involvement of chemical signals transported from the roots to shoots in this stomatal response was investigated in split-root experiments (Day et al., 1991). No evidence for a nonhydraulic root signal was found in P. taeda seedlings when half the root system was exposed to 24°C and half to either 7 or 1°C. Instead, feedback inhibition of A by carbohydrate accumulation due to reduced root metabolic activity and sink strength at low Ts was suggested to be involved in this response (Day et al., 1991). In other species this response may be related to plant growth regulators produced by roots or close coupling between xylem flux, epidermal turgor, and gs (Teskey et al., 1983; DeLucia et al., 1991). Although the effect of low Ts on gas exchange may not be a direct consequence of plant water deficits, stomatal closure in response to low Ts may effectively avoid foliar water deficits associated with impaired water uptake from cold soil.
Preferential carbon allocation to root systems in drought-prone environments results in a more favorable functional balance between water absorptive and water-expending tissues and improved potential for dehydration avoidance. Seedlings of conifer species or families native to more xeric environments are sometimes characterized by larger root–shoot ratios (Bongarten and Teskey, 1987; Joly et al., 1989), but not always (Strauss and Ledig, 1985; Barton and Teeri, 1993). The abscission of older foliage coupled with fine root mortality during seasonal periods of decreased soil moisture availability results in a readjustment in root–shoot balance. Further, this reduction in leaf area coincident with rapid production of fine roots following replenishment of soil moisture will result in an increased root–shoot ratio and may enhance plant capacity for stress recovery (Bartsch, 1987; Chaves and Pereira, 1992).
You must be logged in to post a comment.