Photo credit: Google
Pinus palustris 235.jpg
Adjustments in hydraulic architecture of Pinus palustris maintain similar stomatal conductance in xeric and mesic habitats
by Addington R. N., Donovan L. A., Mitchell R. J., Vose J. M., Pecot S. D., Jack S. B., Hacke U. G., Sperry J. S., Oren R. (2006)
in Plant, Cell & Environment 29, Issue 4, April 2006, 535–545 –
We investigated relationships between whole-tree hydraulic architecture and stomatal conductance in Pinus palustris Mill. (longleaf pine) across habitats that differed in soil properties and habitat structure. Trees occupying a xeric habitat (characterized by sandy, well-drained soils, higher nitrogen availability and lower overstory tree density) were shorter in stature and had lower sapwood-to-leaf area ratio (AS:AL) than trees in a mesic habitat.
The soil-leaf water potential gradient (ΨS − ΨL) and leaf-specific hydraulic conductance (kL) were similar between sites, as was tissue-specific hydraulic conductivity (KS) of roots.
Leaf and canopy stomatal conductance (gS and GS, respectively) were also similar between sites, and they tended to be somewhat higher at the xeric site during morning hours when vapour pressure deficit (D) was low.
A hydraulic model incorporating tree height, AS:AL and ΨS − ΨL accurately described the observed variation in individual tree GSref (GS at D = 1 kPa) across sites and indicated that tree height was an important determinant of GSref across sites. This, combined with a 42% higher root-to-leaf area ratio (AR:AL) at the xeric site, suggests that xeric site trees are hydraulically well equipped to realize equal – and sometimes higher – potential for conductance compared with trees on mesic sites.
However, a slightly more sensitive stomatal closure response to increasing D observed in xeric site trees suggests that this potential for higher conductance may only be reached when D is low and when the capacity of the hydraulic system to supply water to foliage is not greatly challenged.